[Chrissyx]

Zitat von Spinelli666

Das ist absolut und schlichtweg falsch; es gibt Pro-Gamer-Feedback bei die Summits und in die Foren und Beriechte an Studio, aber genau so viel von Hardcore-Fans, Modders, Fan-Seiten-Owner und aktive Foren-Mitglieder. Es wird auch sehr genau zwischen Pro-Gamer und Hardcore-Fans differenziert, wenn Feedback bewertet ist, Gelegenheits-Spieler auch nicht zu vergessen, die weniger Ahnung haben, aber das Großteil des Umsatz entspricht.

Ich würde so weit gehen, zu sagen dass sollte es ein weitere Summit geben, dann wird es gar kein Pro-Gamer dahinfahren, jedenfalls nicht aus Deutschland. Keine Ahnung woher diese "Information" herkommt, ist aber nicht korrekt. War mehrmals selber dabei...

Predator selber gab immer wieder Pro-Gamer als Grund an an:

Zitat von Predator

-We also found in our focus groups that people were confused why they had no radar when they had enough power. Logically it just didn't make sense. And we tested this through a lot of people.

-the balance testers are not lame Generals players, don't invalidate your point by using it as a way to burn some other people who have helped balance this game to extraordinary heights for you. I'm not going to listen to an opinion like that, and by the way, the balance testers were by and large not just Generals players, they were players of all RTS games, and generally pro-players at that.

-We're going to reach out to hardcore gamers who we can bring in to the studio, play the game all day long, give us valuable feedback because Greg Black can't do it all on his own.

-Bottom line, when 8 hardcore gamers are all liberating with the same argument very passionately about a gameplay mechanic change, then you don't stare at them and not look at it.

-We invited "professional"/really good RTS players here to EALA to help balance Command & Conquer 3 and the Radar change was a by-product of that program.

*hust*